This website requires Javascript to function properly. Please go to the setting of your web browser and enable Javascript for this website.

Ad by

最优利率和cashback可以申请特批，好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询，Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。

Ad by

最优利率和cashback可以申请特批，好信用好收入offer更好。请点链接扫码加微信咨询，Scotiabank -- Nick Zhang 6478812600。

1.2.3..

wzap(识食物者为俊杰)

1. 如果你认同 Adam and Eve 的创造者, 那么你就不应该再鼓吹同性婚姻。

Did I 鼓吹同性婚姻 in my post above?

2. 如果你不认同 Adam and Eve 的创造者，也就没有Adam and Eve 的肋骨之说 #2104332 不过是胡搅蛮缠。

Did I have any statement in my post? I just asked a question, you didn't even answer it.. how come you said I was "不过是胡搅蛮缠"

3. 存在并不一定是合理合法，无论现时的法律如何定义。

Gay is a "存在", but can you prove "Adam and Eve 的肋骨之说" is a "存在"? How to define "合理合法"? based on your bible?

(#2106307@0)
Last Updated: 2005-2-2
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.

Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

枫下茶话 / 社会 / 简生：加拿大，不要亵渎亚当与夏娃(ZT 51.ca) -mrblack(黑森); 2004-12-20 (#2037208@0)

支持！同性“婚姻”合法化是人类最后的疯狂！ -maer(马儿); 2004-12-20 (#2037214@0)

胡说 -bigcooler(cooler); 2004-12-20 {54} (#2038139@0)
下次异类(比如人和猫什么的)结婚合法化都不是"最后"的，

Same sex activities have long been existing, but not respected. It is time to give them the right they've ever deserved. -rollor(Rollor); 2004-12-20 (#2037253@0)

男人干男人那是权力，但不能称之为婚姻。否则接下去父女结婚、母子结婚、人畜结婚都可以说是权力。 -sososo(sososo); 2004-12-20 (#2038017@0)

父女或者母子结婚所生育的孩子有畸形的可能性非常大，会造成大量浪费社会资源，所以要禁止。男人和男人结婚生不了孩子，不会给社会造成破坏。 -lionel(Lionel); 2005-1-31 (#2103541@0)

They could produce AIDS. -wnms2000(乘风归去); 2005-2-1 (#2104205@0)

Wrong. Very wrong. -rollor(Rollor); 2005-2-1 (#2104252@0)
it's discrimination -geegle(giggle:)); 2005-2-1 (#2104265@0)
wow, wow, this is a totally new discover, you could be honored by Noble prize with your conclusion, @_@ -table(桌子来了); 2005-2-1 (#2104271@0)

It's the matter of time that same-sex marriage will be recognized by the public. -fuzzy(dizzy); 2004-12-20 (#2038026@0)

then parents-kids marriage, human beings-animals marriage...... -sososo(sososo); 2004-12-20 (#2038033@0)

If there would be that many people demanding incest marriage as same-sex marriage, you could be right. -fuzzy(dizzy); 2004-12-20 {69} (#2038045@0)
But I don't see it's going to happen. At least not in my life time.

They do whatever they want to enjoy their life. Does that hurt you? -tiger5z(Turbo Lover); 2005-1-31 (#2103340@0)
如果同性婚姻可以得到承认，为什么法律不承认一夫多妻或一妻多夫了？ -mao(<>); 2005-1-31 (#2103881@0)

各有所好，只是不要影响自己和家人的健康就好 -ecats(ecats); 2005-1-31 (#2103886@0)

‘you know who'说：这。这。不是我安排的。是撒旦捣的鬼。 -647i(盲人协会); 2005-2-1 (#2104056@0)
a marriage between a human being (亚当) and his side bone (夏娃), a marriage between 2 同性 human being. which one sounds weirder? -wzap(识食物者为俊杰); 2005-2-1 (#2104332@0)

1.2.3 -mssg(Wild_Killer); 2005-2-2 {222} (#2106263@0)
1. 如果你认同 Adam and Eve 的创造者, 那么你就不应该再鼓吹同性婚姻。

2. 如果你不认同 Adam and Eve 的创造者，也就没有Adam and Eve 的肋骨之说 #2104332 不过是胡搅蛮缠。

3. 存在并不一定是合理合法，无论现时的法律如何定义。

[如果你认同 Adam and Eve 的创造者, 那么你就不应该再鼓吹同性婚姻。], as I knew, many Christans and Catholic believers are very supportive equal marriage issue -littlesong(_); 2005-2-2 (#2106270@0)

of course you won't refer to the majority of them. after all, you choose what you want.....that's why we are out of Eden. -mssg(Wild_Killer); 2005-2-2 (#2106274@0)

the point is, you are here to TEACH them, you [should], you [should not] -littlesong(_); 2005-2-2 (#2106278@0)

what' wrong with that? read Bible yourself then. -mssg(Wild_Killer); 2005-2-2 (#2106301@0)

这样的believers实在是。。。，打个比方就像一个和尚都吃肉了，还说自己是持戒的。 -smallwhale(喝不了咖啡); 2005-2-2 (#2106289@0)

1.2.3.. -wzap(识食物者为俊杰); 2005-2-2 {542} (#2106307@0)
1. 如果你认同 Adam and Eve 的创造者, 那么你就不应该再鼓吹同性婚姻。

Did I 鼓吹同性婚姻 in my post above?

2. 如果你不认同 Adam and Eve 的创造者，也就没有Adam and Eve 的肋骨之说 #2104332 不过是胡搅蛮缠。

Did I have any statement in my post? I just asked a question, you didn't even answer it.. how come you said I was "不过是胡搅蛮缠"

3. 存在并不一定是合理合法，无论现时的法律如何定义。

Gay is a "存在", but can you prove "Adam and Eve 的肋骨之说" is a "存在"? How to define "合理合法"? based on your bible?

sorry, I was replying to littlesong..must have clicked wrong <reply>.... -mssg(Wild_Killer); 2005-2-2 {161} (#2106312@0)
I don't think your words make sense ...

How to define "合理合法"? - everyone has their own definition, opinion...not fact....

I can't approve faith....

这是一个谁也说服不了谁的话题, 干脆LET IT BE, 爱谁谁. 过好自己的日子是真. 不管是同性婚姻也好, 异性婚姻也好, 无所谓, 但BS双性婚姻, 吃着碗里, 占着锅里. -noproblem(大可以); 2005-2-2 (#2106279@0)

hahahah, misunderstanding and misleading about Bisexual people, LOL -littlesong(_); 2005-2-2 (#2106284@0)
在家门以外，LET THEM BE，我不打听不知道谁是谁不是，所以我不歧视，但是在我家门以内，这是绝对不允许的！我要教育我的儿子们：他们病了，就象我儿子问我路边轮子在干嘛？我解释他们是CRAZY PEOPLE. -llrm(小陳不姓徐); 2005-2-2 (#2106290@0)

@Baltimore

1.2.3..

Replies, comments and Discussions:

More Topics